Measurement comparison

Plyomat vs. Vertec/Just Jump Mat

The same athlete can earn different vertical-jump numbers on a Vertec, Just Jump Mat, laser-timing system, and Plyomat. Here is why, and how to convert a Just Jump/Vertec score to its accurate Plyomat equivalent.

Verified Just Jump/Vertec comparison

Enter a score. See the accurate height.

Accuracy Conversion

Enter a Just Jump or Vertec score below. The same verified calculation applies to both, so there is no selector to create confusion.

30.0 in
Entered score
24.3 in
Accurate Plyomat height
+5.7 in
Difference

Just Jump's verified 1.1119 flight-time factor is squared in the jump-height calculation: 1.1119² = 1.2363. Divide the Just Jump/Vertec score by 1.2363 to see the accurate Plyomat height.

What each system measures

One athlete. Four measurement rules.

Jump-and-reach

Vertec

Measures the gap between standing reach and the highest vane touched. Arm swing, shoulder reach, and touch technique can all add to the displayed jump-height number.

Why it can read higher: it captures reach at the top of the jump, not a surface-level contact event. Use the verified Just Jump/Vertec accuracy conversion shown above.

Contact mat

Just Jump Mat

Uses a contact mat and applies a verified 1.1119 flight-time factor. Because jump height is proportional to flight time squared, the display becomes 1.2363 times the raw height.

Why it reads higher: that built-in factor produces approximately 23.6% more displayed jump height.

Elevated laser timing

Laser timing

Uses a laser beam positioned above the floor rather than a surface-level contact. It is a useful contactless option, especially where a mat is not practical.

Why it can read higher: the elevated beam creates a different takeoff and landing boundary. In side-by-side comparisons, laser timing has often read about 2 to 4 inches higher than force-plate values, depending on setup and movement.

Surface-level contact timing

Plyomat

Measures the feet leaving and returning to the mat surface. It reports raw flight-time jump height, contact time, RSI, and more on the controller and in the app.

What makes it useful: a direct, repeatable surface-level reference for accurate jump height.

The important distinction

One verified factor. A clear answer.

For Just Jump and Vertec, use the same verified accuracy conversion on this page: divide the score by 1.1119² to see the accurate Plyomat flight-time height.

That factor turns an approximately 11% flight-time adjustment into about a 23.6% difference in displayed jump height.

Laser timing belongs in the conversation for a different reason. Its elevated beam uses a different timing boundary than a surface-level force plate or mat, which is why its displayed score can also run higher. Keep the device and protocol consistent within a testing block.

A clean transition

Get to an accurate number

1

Enter the score

Enter a Just Jump or Vertec result into the Accuracy Conversion.

2

Apply the verified factor

Divide the score by 1.2363. The result is the accurate Plyomat flight-time reference.

3

Test consistently

Use the same device and protocol within a testing block so changes in the number reflect the athlete, not the measurement method.

Side by side

Plyomat, Vertec, Just Jump & laser timing

CapabilityVertecJust Jump MatLaser timingPlyomat
Primary methodJump-and-reachFlight-time contact matElevated laser timingSurface-level contact mat
Why scores can run highTop-of-reach measurementVerified 1.2363 factorLaser beam above the floorRaw contact event at mat surface
Difference vs force plateUses JJ/Vertec accuracy conversion+23.6% verifiedOften +2 to 4 in*Slightly higher*

Vertec

Primary methodJump-and-reach
Why scores can run highTop-of-reach measurement
Difference vs force plateJJ/Vertec accuracy conversion

Just Jump Mat

Primary methodFlight-time contact mat
Why scores can run highVerified 1.2363 factor
Difference vs force plate+23.6% verified

Laser timing

Primary methodElevated laser timing
Why scores can run highLaser beam above floor
Difference vs force plateOften +2 to 4 in*

Plyomat

Primary methodSurface-level contact mat
Why scores can run highRaw contact event at mat
Difference vs force plateSlightly higher*

*Observed in Plyomat side-by-side comparisons. Laser-timing results can vary with setup and athlete movement. Plyomat is only slightly higher than force-plate values.

Questions

Comparison FAQ

Why are the numbers different?
Vertec measures top-of-reach height, Just Jump applies a verified flight-time factor, laser timing uses an elevated beam, and Plyomat detects surface-level contact. Those different boundaries produce different displayed numbers.
How do I convert a Just Jump or Vertec score to Plyomat?
Use the Accuracy Conversion. Divide the score by 1.1119² (about 1.2363) to estimate the accurate Plyomat flight-time height. A 30-inch score becomes 24.3 inches.
Why can laser timing show a higher number?
Laser timing uses an elevated beam, so it does not use the same surface-level timing boundary as a contact mat or force plate. In Plyomat side-by-side comparisons, it has often displayed about 2 to 4 inches higher than force-plate values, depending on setup and athlete movement.

Keep the context. Upgrade the measurement.

Plyomat gives your team a clear jump-height signal, contact time, RSI, and a way to preserve Just Jump-era comparisons without burying the underlying number.

Shop Plyomat systems →