Stiffness vs Compliance: Understanding the Muscle-Tendon Complex
In sports performance, there are few topics more misunderstood — or more impactful — than stiffness. Coaches often hear the word and assume it’s a bad thing. But in reality, stiffness is a performance amplifier, especially when we understand how it works in the muscle-tendon complex (MTC) and how to apply it to different types of plyometric training.
Let’s break it down.
🧠 What Is Stiffness?
Stiffness is the ability of a tissue or system to resist deformation when force is applied.
The more stiff a structure, the less it will stretch under a given force — and the faster it can recoil. In physics terms, we refer to Hooke’s Law:
F = kx
Where F is the applied force, x is displacement, and k is the stiffness constant.
In biomechanics, we care about three main types of stiffness:
- Vertical stiffness (Kvert) — important in jumping and hopping
- Leg stiffness (Kleg) — relevant in sprinting and acceleration
- Joint stiffness (Kjoint) — measured at the ankle, knee, or hip
Each tells us something about how athletes store and return elastic energy.
What Is Compliance?
Compliance is the inverse of stiffness. A compliant muscle-tendon unit deforms more under the same force.
While stiffness helps with fast, explosive transitions, compliance is valuable when you need:
- Greater joint range of motion
- Slower, more forceful contractions
- Lower ground reaction forces (softer landings, for example)
The real magic happens when athletes have the right amount of stiffness or compliance for the task at hand.
⚙️ The Muscle-Tendon Complex (MTC): Hardware vs Software
Think of the muscle-tendon complex as a two-part system:
|
Hardware |
Software |
|
Muscle architecture, fascicle length, tendon length, CSA |
Motor unit recruitment, firing rate, reflexes, co-contraction, inhibition |
From a structural standpoint, the MTC consists of:
- Contractile Element (CE) – sarcomeres (muscle fibers)
- Series Elastic Component (SEC) – tendons
- Parallel Elastic Component (PEC) – fascia
And the SEC — the tendon — is where most elastic energy storage and recoil occurs.

How It All Works in Plyometric Movements
✅ Drop Jump
- High stiffness task
- Ground contact time: <250ms (Fast SSC)
- Tendon stores and returns up to 66% of elastic energy
- Muscles act quasi-isometrically — holding tension while tendons stretch
Best for:
- Training stiffness, RSI
- Explosive vertical power
- Evaluating reactivity
✅ Countermovement Jump (CMJ)
- More compliant movement
- Ground contact: >250ms (Slow SSC)
- More contribution from muscle fibers (CE)
- Less tendon recoil, more fascicle shortening
Best for:
- Assessing power output
- Reflecting longer-duration athletic efforts
- RSI-modified assessments (RSImod)
✅ Squat Jump (SJ)
- No stretch-shortening cycle (static start)
- Purely contractile (no elastic energy benefit)
- Good for measuring baseline concentric force
Best for:
- Strength profiling
- Comparing elastic vs non-elastic contributions
Why Balance Matters: Stiffness and Compliance Are Both Good
🔹 Too much stiffness → bone stress injuries, poor deceleration control
🔹 Too much compliance → reduced force transfer, injury in high-load tasks

Instead of chasing stiffness blindly, athletes need:
- Sport-specific adaptations (e.g., stiff for sprinters, compliant for decelerators)
- Task-specific qualities (jumping, cutting, landing, rebounding)
- Tunable systems that can alternate between stiffness and compliance
How Stiffness Is Improved
Research from Kubo, Burgess, and others shows:
|
Training Method |
Affects Muscle |
Affects Tendon |
|
Strength training |
✅ Yes |
⚠️ Only if very heavy or isometric |
|
Plyometric training |
✅ Yes |
❌ Minimal tendon adaptation |
|
Sprints / bounds |
✅ Yes |
❌ Only moderate effects |
|
Static stretching |
❌ Decreases stiffness temporarily |
❌ |
|
Core training / balance |
✅ Indirectly improves control |
❌ |
Note: Tendons only adapt with heavy isometrics or long durations under tension — not from jumping alone.
How We Measure Stiffness Today
Old school tools like the Just Jump Mat gave us raw jump height, but lacked insight into ground contact time — a critical part of assessing reactive strength.
That’s where RSI and tools like Plyomat come in:
- RSI = Jump Height / Contact Time (usually drop jump)
- RSI-modified = Jump Height / Time to Takeoff (CMJ)
- GCT thresholds tell athletes whether they’re hitting the right zone for each drill
- Color feedback (Green/Red) gives real-time performance cues
Wrap-Up: What Coaches Should Know
- Stiffness is not bad. It’s essential for performance — when managed correctly.
- Compliance isn’t weak. It’s essential for absorbing force and preventing injury.
- You train and assess both through contextual plyometric tasks.
- Plyomat gives you a simple way to track these traits in every session — with numbers that matter: contact time, jump height, RSI.
From the Blog
Introducing the Plyomat Power Score (PPS)
When assessing Lower Body Power as mentioned in last week’s blog: Switch Mats...
Reactive Strength Quadrant Part Two: Programming...
Plyometrics should not live in a world of guesswork. We have the ability to...
Using Ground Contact Time (GCT) as a Modulator...
Plyometric training is built on the stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) — a rapid...
