Plyomat vs Skyhook

Two great contact mats, one right fit

Skyhook and Plyomat are both force-based jump mats that measure vertical jump and ground contact — no laser, no guesswork. Here's an honest, non-disparaging look at where each one wins, so you can match the mat to how your program actually tests.

The honest short version

Same category, different priorities

Skyhook (Encore / RDM Innovation) is a single-piece, fully-wireless contact mat — ~31×31″, carry handle, Bluetooth, no mat-to-controller cable. It adds free cloud roster and athlete tracking, a Just Jump toggle, and strong third-party reviews (SimpliFaster, A1 Athlete). For a tidy grab-and-go mat, it's well built.

Plyomat is a modular force-based system — switch mats plus a Controller 3.0 with an on-device screen, so you can test without a phone. It adds RSQ (Reactive Strength Quadrant), Power Score, and asymmetry, times contact to 0.001 s, and ships with published force-plate validation.

Straight talk: Skyhook's all-in-one wireless build and free cloud sync are real wins — cloud sync is a current Plyomat gap. Plyomat answers with a lower, transparent price, on-device team testing, cheaper modular replacement, and deeper metrics. Both are US-built, no subscription — a tie.

Side by side

Plyomat vs Skyhook

 SkyhookPlyomat
TechnologyForce-based contact matForce-based contact mat
Form factorAll-in-one wireless (~31×31″, Bluetooth)Modular mats + Controller 3.0
MeasuresJump height, contact time, RSIJump height, contact time, RSI, RSQ, Power Score, asymmetry
On-device screenPhone neededYes (Controller 3.0)
Cloud athlete trackingFree cloud roster & trackingNot built in today
Contact-time resolutionBluetooth matTimed to 0.001 s
Force-plate validationThird-party reviewsPublished (r≈0.97, ICC 0.85)
Just Jump compatibilityJust Jump toggleNative Plyomat metrics
Mat replacementWhole unitModular — single mat
Pricing~$1,099–$1,389 (by retailer)Mats from $200 · system $950
Built in the USAYesYes
SubscriptionNoneNone

Skyhook pricing varies by retailer (~$1,099–$1,389). Both mats are US-built, no subscription — a tie, not a Plyomat-only win.

Why coaches pick Plyomat

Where Plyomat wins on fit

$

Lower, honest pricing

Mats from $200, full system $950 — transparent, not a number that swings by retailer.

On-device screen

The Controller 3.0 shows results on the unit, so you can test a full team fast — no phone to pass around.

Modular & serviceable

Mats and controller are separate, so a worn mat is a cheap single-part swap — not a whole-unit replacement.

Deeper metrics

Beyond jump height, contact time, and RSI, you also get RSQ, Power Score, and asymmetry to profile athletes fully.

Force-plate validated

Validated vs an AccuPower force plate: r≈0.97, ICC 0.85, ~1 cm mean difference — published, not just claimed.

Precise & subscription-free

Contact timed to 0.001 s, a free app, no subscription — made in the USA, like Skyhook.

Questions

Plyomat vs Skyhook FAQ

What's the difference between Plyomat and Skyhook?
Both are force-based contact mats, packaged differently. Skyhook is a single-piece, fully-wireless mat (~31×31″, Bluetooth) with free cloud roster and athlete tracking. Plyomat is modular — switch mats plus a Controller 3.0 with an on-device screen, so you can test without a phone, and it adds RSQ, Power Score, and asymmetry. Both are US-built, no subscription.
Is Plyomat a good alternative to a Skyhook contact mat?
Yes. Plyomat is a strong Skyhook alternative for a lower, transparent price (mats from $200, system $950 vs ~$1,099–$1,389), an on-device screen, cheaper modular mat replacement, deeper metrics (RSQ, Power Score), and published force-plate validation. Skyhook wins if a single all-in-one wireless mat and free cloud sync are your priorities.
How much does a Skyhook contact mat cost compared to Plyomat?
Skyhook pricing is inconsistent across retailers, roughly $1,099–$1,389 for the wireless mat. Plyomat switch mats start at $200, and a complete portable system (two mats + Controller 3.0 + cables) is $950. Neither requires a subscription.
Does Skyhook or Plyomat sync to the cloud?
Skyhook includes free cloud roster and athlete tracking — a genuine strength and a current Plyomat gap. Plyomat uses a free app (no subscription) and an on-device Controller 3.0 screen, but no built-in cloud athlete database today. If cloud sync is essential, Skyhook has the edge there.
Is Plyomat or Skyhook more accurate?
Both read contact through surface force, not an optical beam. Plyomat times contact to 0.001 s and publishes validation against an AccuPower force plate (r≈0.97, ICC 0.85, ~1 cm mean difference). Skyhook has a strong third-party review presence (SimpliFaster, A1 Athlete). For a documented, force-plate-validated signal, Plyomat publishes its numbers — see Reactive Strength Index.

The same force-based signal — at a fairer price.

Vertical jump, contact time, RSI, RSQ, Power Score, and asymmetry on a force-plate-validated mat with an on-device screen — US-built, no subscription.

Shop Plyomat & systems →